[ Type the abstract of the papers here. The abstract is typically a short sum-up of the contents of the papers. Type the abstract of the papers here. The abstract is typically a short sum-up of the contents of the papers. ]
IKEA Case Study
IKEA is the universe ‘s most exultant planetary endeavor. Harmonizing to the statistics, in 2007, IKEA had established around 300 place adorning retail shops in 35 states. It has been visited by around 583 million clients. IKEA ‘s cheap, cleverly designed merchandises, exhibited in immense terminal shops, made gross revenues of a‚¬21.2 billion merely in the twelvemonth 2008 compared to a‚¬4.4 billion in the twelvemonth 1994. Although IKEA has refused to publish statistics of its profitableness, the net net income borders of IKEA were believed to be about 10 % higher than an mean retail merchant. Ingvar Kamprad, the laminitis of IKEA, is believed to be one of the richest work forces in the universe.
IKEA was founded in 1943 in Sweden by Kamprad when he was merely 17 old ages old. The immature administration sold Christmas magazines, fish, and seeds of his household spread. His primary concern was merchandising lucifers. The IKEA is an acronym: I and K are the initials of Ingvar Kamprad ; E is for Elmtaryd, which is the name of his household spread and A is for Agunnaryd, which is the name of his place town. Shortly, Kamprad added ballpen pens to his merchandise scope and innovated the manner of selling through mail. His terminal was a hovel on his household spread.
In the twelvemonth 1948, furniture was added to the company ‘s merchandise line and by the twelvemonth 1949, the really first catalogue was published. In the twelvemonth 1953, Kamprad bought an unoccupied industrial unit in Almhult and converted it into a terminal. With the rapid growing of the concern, Kamprad recruited Gillis Lundgren, a immature interior decorator, who ab initio helped out to make snapshots for the catalogues, subsequently on he began to make furniture designs for IKEA, which includes many best Sellerss.
Corporate scheme chiefly is focused to the aggregation of concerns in which an administration competes and develops and coordinates the concern portfolio ( Baum & A ; McGahan 2004, p 55-87 ) . Corporate scheme trades with:
aˆ? Corporate duties ; these include end designation, type of concern, he procedure of concern direction.
aˆ? Specifying the rivals.
aˆ? Developing synergisms by organizing, sharing and puting forces, fiscal resources and other assets across all the concern units and utilizing concern units to help other corporate activities.
aˆ? Management manner such as centralisation or decentalisation.
Administrations are apt to make value through their concerns by keeping their concern portfolio, doing certain that their concerns are booming for a long clip ( Baum & A ; McGahan 2004, p 55-87 ) .
Therefore, the of import inquiries addressed by corporate scheme are:
What kind of concerns we should be in?
How can we implement the synergisms among different units of the concern?
What are the international tendencies that are impacting our concern, and how can we pull strings them?
Business scheme is concerned with making and nurturing a competitory border for the merchandises that are produced and services that are rendered. Business scheme trades with:
aˆ? turn uping the concern against rivals
aˆ? foretelling alterations in engineerings and demand
aˆ? pull stringsing the competitory nature with the aid of strategic actions.
Kamprad has successfully used his abstention to cut down seller monetary values. IKEA makes a determination of what you want and Tells you to purchase that alternatively of trusting on R & A ; D to calculate out your demands ( Thompson 2002, p 22-31 ) . They place small points called the “ hot Canis familiariss ” ( due to their improbably low monetary value ) throughout their warehouse and when you see them you feel the impulse to purchase them even though you did non necessitate it.
Another concern scheme used by IKEA is that when a rival introduces similar trade goods into the market at a relatively inexpensive monetary value, IKEA goes for a “ stripped-down and even cheaper ” policy to vie with its rivals.
The important concern scheme that helped wealth maximizing for the Kamprads was the formation of the IKEA Group and the Stitching in the twelvemonth 1982 where Kamprad gave his portions to the alleged charity largely for the intent of tax-exemption and to lock up IKEA to avoid bankruptcy or sale ( Thompson 2002, p 22-31 ) .
IKEA ‘s success has accredited to luck, good showmanship and timing, compulsion, strategic ferociousness, efficiency, good corporate, concern and planetary scheme – and the capableness to turn around barriers into competitory border.
IKEA opened its first United States shop in 1985 in Philadelphia. The company had decided to turn up on the seashores. Surveies of American consumers suggested that IKEA consumers would likely be people who had travelled overseas, name themselves hazard takers, and are fond of all right nutrient and vino. These people were concentrated on the seashores ( Thompson 2002, p 22-31 ) . Although IKEA ab initio garnered favorable reappraisals, and adequate gross revenues to carry it to get down opening extra shops, by the early 1990s, it was clear that things were non traveling good in America. The company realised that its European inspired offerings did non normally go with American consumers. Centimeters were used to mensurate beds, non the twin, male monarch, queen and sizes with which Americans are used to ( Segil 2005, p 46-52 ) . American sheets did non suit on IKEA beds. Sofas were non large plenty, closet was non deep plenty, spectacless were excessively little, drapes were excessively short, and kitchens did non suit American-size contraptions.
In a narrative frequently repeated at IKEA, directors noted that clients were purchasing glass vases and utilizing them to imbibe out of, instead than the little spectacless for sale at IKEA. The spectacless were seemingly excessively little for Americans who like to add broad measures of ice to their drinks. To do affairs worse, IKEA was sourcing many of the goods from abroad, priced in the Swedish kronor, which was beef uping against the American dollar. This drove up the monetary value of goods in IKEA ‘s American shops ( Thompson 2002, p 22-31 ) . Furthermore, some of the shops were ill located, and non big plenty to offer the full IKEA experience familiar to Europeans. Turning around its American operations required IKEA to take some decisive actions. Many merchandises had to be redesigned to suit with American demands. Newer and larger shop locations were chosen. To convey monetary values down, goods were sourced from lower-cost locations and priced in dollars.
IKEA besides started to beginning some merchandises from mills in the United States to cut down both conveyance costs and dependence on the value of the dollar. Simultaneously, IKEA noticed a alteration in American civilization ( Segil 2005, p 46-52 ) . Americans were going more concerned with design, and more unfastened to the thought of disposable furniture. It used to be said that Americans changed their partners about every bit often as they changed their dining room tabular arraies, but something was switching in American civilization. Younger people were more unfastened to put on the line and more willing to experiment. There was a thirst for design elegance and quality. Starbucks was tapping into this, as was Apple Computer, and so did IKEA.
To tap into America ‘s shifting civilization, IKEA reemphasized design and started advancing the trade name with a series of far-out hip advertizements aimed at a younger demographic: immature married twosomes, college pupils, and 20- to 30-something singles.
One IKEA commercial, called “ Unboring, ” made merriment of the reluctance of Americans to portion with their furniture ( Segil 2005, p 46-52 ) .
The displacement in tactics worked. IKEA ‘s grosss doubled within four old ages from $ 600 million in 1997 to $ 1.27 billion in 2001. By 2008, IKEA had its 2nd largest market in the US, after Germany, with 35 shops accounting for 10 % of its entire grosss, or around $ 2.4 billion, and enlargement programs called for 50-plus shops in the United States by 2012.
During the last century there was an addition in growing of international companies in the universe. The rush of globalisation has forced companies to cover with clients with different cultural backgrounds. China has faced singular roar in the economic growing in the last 20 old ages and is now a planetary concern attractive force ( Segil 2005, p 46-52 ) . China ‘s colossal potency in concern has compelled many international administrations to vie in pulling Chinese consumers. Some have succeeded but some have lost. However, IKEA is now on the victorious side.
In 1998, IKEA penetrated into the Chinese market when it opened its first shop in Shanghai, the fiscal hub of the China. However, the demand for enlargement is evermore. IKEA ‘s market public presentation in Shanghai is based on the 4Ps of marketing mix theoretical account. In order to achieve client value and construct long-run client relationship in China, IKEA has to believe globally and move locally.
The three generic schemes of Michael Porter i.e. cost leading, distinction, and concentrate can be applied at the concern degree to accomplish a competitory border over the rivals.
Therefore, the chief organisational inquiries they address are:
What markets can we stand out in?
What resources do we hold to make in order to win in this concern unit?
What is our alone distinguishing value proposition?
To carry through their mission and derive competitory advantage, IKEA adopted Porter ‘s generic scheme which enables administrations can accomplish greater value at low costs by separating their goods and services from the goods and services of their rivals ( Porter 1985 ) .
Cost leading is the basic of the Porter ‘s three generic schemes. In this scheme, house should seek their best to cut down the cost. For a house to be a top performing artist in its industry it has to accomplish and prolong cost leading but the house has to guarantee that it does non overlook the footing of distinction. Harmonizing to Porter, if a consumer feels that a company ‘s merchandise is non good as compared to its rival ‘s merchandise, the house should accomplish cost leading by cut downing the monetary value of the merchandise ( Byars 1991, p 113 ) .
Differentiation is Porter ‘s 2nd generic scheme in which a house looks for going typical in its industry. It opts for one or more features that are perceived of import by the consumers in an industry, places itself distinctively to fulfill those desires, this peculiarity consequences in great value ( Byars 1991, p 113 ) .
If the excess cost for distinction is less than the premiums monetary value, the house which has the competitory advantage of distinction can acquire better profitableness than other houses in the industry ( Pearce & A ; Robinson 2005 p 15-36 ) . Because the excess cost for distinction is the disadvantage of the distinction, the house can non disregard the cost place. So, merely based on the monetary value is about the same as rival, the discriminator could acquire the high profitableness.
Focus is Porter ‘s 3rd generic scheme which means to take a all right competitory range in an industry. Here, the administration opts for a niche or group of niches and alters its scheme to function them entirely. The focussed administration opts to accomplish a competitory border in its mark niches even if it does non keep a competitory border over the remainder of the industry. The focal point scheme has two fluctuations. Cost focal point is the scheme in which a house opts for a cost border in its targeted niche, whereas in distinction focal point a house opts for a distinction in its targeted niche. ( Porter, 1985 )
The house can concentrate the clip, the resource and the money on the section to acquire the competitory advantage. If the house can acquire the competitory advantage of cost leading or distinction in its mark section, the house could supply client the better service and run into the particular demand. Because of the different demands of client, there are ever many sections in one industry ( Byars 1991, p 113 ) .
Porter ‘s each scheme has a different intent of making and prolonging competitory border.
If a house is flexible utilizing the schemes, like usage more than one scheme at the same clip, this house will acquire a greater competitory advantage and market portion ( Capron & A ; Glazer 1987, p 10-21 ) .
After the long clip research, there is so much cognition about IKEA. From the web, the interview, and particularly follow the history of IKEA, we can happen many methods which IKEA used to better the competitory advantage ( Pearce & A ; Robinson 2005 p 15-36 ) . This theory of “ competitory advantage ” can be summarised in table 1.
The Five-Force theoretical account of Porter maintains strategic indulgence wherever authorization lies in a concern status. It helps administrations to measure its strength in the current competitory place and the place that the company is choosing for ( Capron & A ; Glazer 1987, p 10-21 ) .
Clear apprehension of the place of the authorization enables an administration to accomplish strengths, better failings, and avoid bad lucks.
In order to carry on the analysis of Porter ‘s Five Force theoretical account, it is necessary to see all important facets for the market state of affairs of the company. Following emphasise the cardinal facets and summarize the magnitude and the grade of that force ( Capron & A ; Glazer 1987, p 10-21 ) .
After recognizing favorable and unfavorable facets for the administration ‘s public presentation and attraction of the industry, it is indispensable to measure the status and scan the consequences of those facets.
By gaining impact of each force on the administration, and by detecting the strength and tendency of that force, it gives a chance to measure the strengths of the place and the capableness to accomplish a continual net income in the industry ( Kotter & A ; Schlesinger 1991, p 24-29 ) .
Invention in the industry is invariably revolutionised which signifies the limited value of Porter ‘s Five Force theoretical account. Hence, it is non reasonable to make a scheme entirely on the foundations of Porter ‘s theoretical accounts, but it can be used to analyze other strategic theoretical accounts such as S.W.O.T analysis and P.E.S.T analysis.
There are many forces that have direct impact on a company ‘s macro-environment. The analysis of such forces is called PEST analysis. PEST analysis is the scrutiny of the external macro-environment in which the organisation works and operates ( Cooper 2000, p 1-15 ) . It can be stated in footings of the undermentioned factors:
The term P.E.S.T ( besides called “ STEP ” ) is used to depict a construction for the probe of macro-environmental issues ( Johnson & A ; Scholes 1993, p 26-55 ) . The P.E.S.T analysis fits into an overall environmental examination as shown in figure 1.
Political factors consist of legal issues and authorities ordinances and include both formal & A ; informal regulations that house must obey ( Cooper 2000, p 1-15 ) . Some illustrations of such ordinances include:
ordinances of the environment
duties & A ; trade restrictions
revenue enhancement policy
stableness in the political relations
Torahs of employment
The economic factors have major affects on the buying power of clients and the cost of capital of the house ( Cooper 2000, p 1-15 ) . Illustrations of such factors are given below:
rate of exchange
rate of rising prices
Demographic and cultural facets are portion of the Social factors of the macro-environment ( Hill & A ; Jones 2005, p 88-96 ) . These factors have a immense impact on the client demands and size of the possible market. Examples of these societal factors include:
growing rate of the population
consciousness of wellness
Technological factors help in cut downing barriers to entry, take downing minimal degree of efficient production, and impacts determinations of out-sourcing ( Cooper 2000, p 1-15 ) . Examples of such factors are:
technological alteration rate
Research & A ; Development activity
inducements of engineering
The PEST analysis helps in the overall analysis of the organisation ( Cooper 2000, p 1-15 ) . It helps in placing chances and menaces to the organisation in the S.W.O.T analysis.
S.W.O.T analysis is the analysis of the internal & A ; external environment. It is a important country of the overall procedure of strategic planning of the organisation ( Hill & A ; Jones 2005, p 88-96 ) . Internal environmental factors of the organisation normally are categorized as failings and strengths, nevertheless, external factors of the house can be categorized as chances and menaces. The S.W.O.T analysis identifies data that is utile in using the house ‘s capablenesss and resources harmonizing to the competitory milieus in which it works ( Cooper 2000, p 1-15 ) . However, it is besides influential in preparation of organisational scheme.
An organisation ‘s capablenesss and resources which can assist the organisation in accomplishing a competitory border over its rivals are the strengths of that organisation. Examples of these strengths include:
cost advantages from concern know-how
suited entree to webs of distribution
strong trade name names
good repute among clients
sole entree to high grade natural resources
The deficiency of the above mentioned strengths may be observed as the failings of that organisation ( Hill & A ; Jones 2005, p 88-96 ) . Examples of such failings are:
high cost construction
hapless position among clients
lack of entree to identify distribution channels
a weak trade name name
deficit of right of first publication protection
deficit of right of entry to the natural resources
Normally, a failing is viewed as the opposite country of strength. Take the illustration where an organisation has much larger sum of fabrication capacity ( Haley & A ; Tan 1999, p 91-104 ) . However, this capacity can be believed as strength of the organisation that rivals do non hold, it may besides be a deemed as a failing of the organisation if the investings in fabricating capacity of the organisation prevents it from reacting fast to alterations in the organisation ‘s strategic environment.
In an organisation ‘s external environment, there may be certain chances which may assist an organisation to gain net income and turn ( Haley & A ; Tan 1999, p 91-104 ) . Following are such chances:
relaxation of ordinances
an unrealized client demand
remotion of international trade barriers
reaching of new engineerings
Organizations are invariably confronting menaces from the external environment. For illustrations such menaces contain:
outgrowth of replacement merchandises
increased trade barriers
displacements in consumer gustatory sensations off from the house ‘s merchandises
The BSC translates vision and scheme into four positions: the acquisition and growing position, the internal concern procedure position, the client position, and the fiscal position.
The fiscal position is a fiscal theoretical account of the house and identifies types of profitableness aims. The client position points out the agencies for developing client and marked penchants and identifies dimensions of the merchandise or service that may run into the value proposition of mark clients. The procedure position is a value concatenation affecting inquiries about production, gross revenues, and distribution installations. Last, the acquisition and growing position is concerned more by and large with organisational capablenesss such as substructure and intangible assets.
The BSC can be understood as a strategic tool for the house. The scheme is merely strong if it can be translated into the BSC, which makes it a mechanism to guarantee quality and communicate scheme at the same time. When pass oning scheme, BSC shows by manner of a scheme map dealingss between the four elements. Then it identifies and communicates peculiar actions and undertakings across the whole BSC image to implement the house ‘s scheme coherently.
Good consequences in larning and growing lead to good consequences in internal procedures, which once more lead to good consequences in client dealingss, and finally to good fiscal consequences. The hereafter of BSC research is considerable. BSC allows research to look into in concrete footings how houses that are wholly inscribed in information can work.
The BCG portfolio analysis is a portfolio analysis with growing rate of concern on the y-axis and competitory relativity on the x-axis. The BCG presumes that concern with high growing rate is better than the concern with low growing rate and a comparative market with high rate is better than the comparative market with low rate.
The proportion of an administration ‘s returns or net incomes usually establishes its comparative significance to that administration.
Continue to put in and to construct the concern and its net incomes.
Minimize investing in constructing the concern but seek to maximise short- and medium-term net incomes. Harvest those net incomes to put in Stars and those job kids considered worthy of seeking to construct into star concerns.
Determine which Problem Children have significant potency to go Stars and which do non. Invest in those with the best potency to go Stars and deprive the remainder.
Divest the Dogs.
The emphasis on market portion in set uping comparative fight is based on the hypothesis that the bigger the administration ‘s market portion, the bigger will be the profitableness of that administration.
In order to picture corporate growing schemes for alternate intents, Ansoff matrix theoretical account can be used to concentrate on an administration ‘s current and prospective goods and industry. There are four possible merchandise and market combination that could lend in the growing of administration with the aid of bing goods and new goods, and in bing markets and new markets.
In market incursion an administration opts to achieve growing with current merchandises in their comparative current market niches in order to hike administration ‘s market portion.
In market development an administration opts to achieve growing by taking its current merchandises to new market niches.
In merchandise development an administration opts to bring forth new merchandises aimed towards its current market niches.
In variegation an administration opts to achieve growing through variegation in new industries by set uping new goods for new industry.
Because the house is spread outing into a new market, a market development scheme typically has more hazard than a market incursion scheme. However, variegation is the most hazardous of the four growing schemes since it requires both merchandise and market development and may be outside the nucleus competences of the house.
For illustration, see IKEA ‘s relationship with providers in Vietnam. IKEA has expanded its supply base in Vietnam to assist back up its turning Asiatic presence. IKEA was attracted to Vietnam by the combination of low-priced labor and cheap natural stuffs. IKEA drives a tough deal with its providers, many of whom say that they make dilutant borders on their gross revenues to IKEA than they do to other foreign purchasers. IKEA demands high quality at a low monetary value. But there is an upside ; IKEA offers the chance of hammering a long-run, high-volume concern relationship. Furthermore, IKEA on a regular basis advises its Vietnamese providers on how to seek out the best and cheapest natural stuffs, how to put up and spread out mills, what equipment to buy, and how to hike productiveness through engineering investings and direction procedure.
IKEA ‘s has built upon its strong planetary trade name designation with typical doctrine and cost leading. IKEA besides preserves complete authorization over the company ‘s design, monetary value and present its broad scope of merchandises internationally and has a merchandise mixture which can supply quality merchandises for all its client ‘s agencies and budget. The major restriction of IKEA is the world that it is mostly trusting on one market which is Europe where it has 82 per centum of retail shops.
However, IKEA is sing its major restriction as a important chance, which includes come ining into come uping markets in parts of Asia and Eastern Europe. The debut of finest lines, in both bing warehouses or in new high-end shops, has led to the rise in gross revenues through the debut of online sites in assorted states. This has resulted in the betterment of client service and decrease of mass demand in the bing warehouses.
Unfortunately, these new debuts are ensuing as a menace of a likely over-saturation of the market which is due to the addition in the debut of indistinguishable merchandises from the rivals at comparatively low monetary values ( Harrison & A ; Boyle 2006, p 269-272 ) . This has resulted in the signifier of negative blow to the gross revenues merchandises in the go oning economic depression in its core European market in add-on to the unfavorable impact of weak dollar on gross revenues in the US, and the instability in political and economic environment of China and Russia besides presents a possible menace, where the IKEA has planned to put deeply shortly.
IKEA is the company that made furniture stylish, inexpensive and disposable. It continues to expose invention in merchandise design, looking to ski shapers who bend wood and shopping cart shapers to understand how to do sturdier furniture. It has made a important attempt to include Norse design and civilization into all of its touch points, which reinforces what IKEA stands for ( Harrison & A ; Boyle 2006, p 269-272 ) . IKEA merely has five-10 per centum market portion, but its consciousness degrees are improbably high for a concern of its size, which speaks to the high affinity for the trade name. Its attempt to cut monetary values on its points every bit good as promote itself in a humourous and far-out manner keeps clients engaged and supports the cult following IKEA has built over the old ages. Additionally, because IKEA had corporate citizenship enterprises in topographic point before it became a corporate tendency, they are tied good to the overall trade name scheme. In 2009, IKEA entered its twenty-fifth market, opened 15 new shops and saw an addition in gross revenues.
In the close hereafter, IKEA ‘s sound enlargement in the retail concern emerges as the focal point of the administration, with schemes non likely to integrate aggressive enlargement into new markets, but would see structuring and fostering in the bing market ( Haley & A ; Tan 1999, p 91-104 ) . Yet, certain changes may be possible with the debut of information engineering, which in the foreseeable hereafter, will hold unfavorable effects on the grosss of some IKEA warehouses, but will take to the positive effects on gross for the company as a whole. Therefore, this is the chief illustration of the manner in which IKEA is seeking to aline itself in order to confront the possible menace to its conventional shops. Buyers may prefer shopping on-line, as IKEA has established its repute for quality and workmanship in its goods, contrasting to the current rule of IKEA that quality of merchandises should be felt by the purchasers before the purchase.
IKEA has incorporated the aggressive enlargement scheme along with all its other schemes within the past few old ages, nevertheless, the disadvantage of the external purchaser market means that the growing in gross revenues of IKEA merchandises in the close hereafter may remain relatively modest ( Haley & A ; Tan 1999, p 91-104 ) .
An betterment in the state of affairs in the economic system in Europe and US and the sustained growing of concern in China, Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, India and Russia have resulted in the accelerated growing from 2006 onwards, with twelvemonth on twelvemonth growing predicted to make dual figures. ( IKEA United Kingdom, 2005 ) The development of e-commerce, doing shopping at IKEA more accessible, may besides hold a positive impact on gross revenues, although no advancement has been seeable on this forepart of late, and as such IKEA has been really guarded over its net income degrees. However, net income borders may fall in the short term as consequence of the enlargement into bing and new emerging markets, with the company confronting high set up costs and low disbursement power, every bit good as several other external issues in developing markets ( Harrison & A ; Boyle 2006, p 269-272 ) . The company has already faced a figure of bureaucratic obstructions in Russia and farther hurdlings can non be ruled out, with similar jobs potentially originating in China.
Baum, J. & A ; McGahan, A. ( 2004 ) , Business Strategy over the Industry Lifecycle, JAI Press, Oxford.
Brookhart, Susan M. “ Portfolio Assessment. ” twenty-first Century Education: A Reference Handbook. 2008. Sage Publications.
Byars, L. ( 1991 ) Strategic Management, Formulation and Implementation – Concepts and Cases, New York: HarperCollins.
Capron, N. and Glazer, R. ( 1987 ) Selling and engineering: a strategic carbon monoxide alliance, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 51 Issue 3, pp.10-21.
Cooper, L. ( 2000 ) Strategic selling planning for radically new merchandises, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 64 Issue 1, pp.1-15.
Cveykus, R. and E. Carter. ( 2006 ) “ Fix the procedure, non the people. Strategic Finance ” . p 26-33.
Drushal, Mary. “ Strategic Planning. ” Encyclopedia of Educational Leadership and Administration. 2006. Sage Publications.
Haley, G. & A ; Tan, C. ( 1999 ) , ‘East vs. West strategic selling direction meets ‘ , Journal of Business & A ; Industrial Marketing, vol. 14, no. 2, pp.91-104
Haley, George T. “ BCG Portfolio Analysis. ” Encyclopedia of Health Care Management. 2003. Sage Publications.
Harrison, J. & A ; Boyle, E. ( 2006 ) , ‘Falling into capableness larning traps: The function of the house ‘s prevailing managerial mental theoretical accounts ‘ , Management Decision, vol. 44, Jan, Y. ( 2002 ) A three-step matrix method for strategic selling direction, Marketing Intelligence and Planning, Vol. 20 Issue 5, pp.269-272.
Harvey, Thomas W. “ Portfolio Theory and Investment Management. ” twenty-first Century Economicss: A Reference Handbook. 2010. Sage Publications
Hill, C.W.H. & A ; Jones, G.R. , 2005. Strategic Management Cases.9th erectile dysfunction. South Western Cengage Learning.
John, Caron St. “ SWOT ( Strength-Weakness-Opportunity-Threat ) Analysis. ” Encyclopedia of Health Care Management. 2003. Sage Publications.
Johnson, G. and Scholes, K. ( 1993 ) Researching Corporate Strategy – Text and Cases, Hemel Hempstead: Prentice-Hall.
Kamp, Bradley P. “ Predatory Pricing and Strategic Entry Barriers. ” twenty-first Century Economicss: A Reference Handbook. 2010. Sage Publications.
Kotler, P. ( 1998 ) Marketing Management – Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control, 9th Edition, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Kotler, P. ( 2003 ) , Marketing Management, Prentice Hall, New Jersey. no. 1, pp. 31-43.
Kotter, J. and Schlesinger, L. ( 1991 ) Choosing schemes for alteration, Harvard Business Review, pp.24-29.
Laermer, Richard ; Simmons, Mark, Punk Marketing, New York: Harper Collins, 2007
Madison, D. ( 2005 ) “ Process Mapping, Process Improvement and Process Management. ” Paton Press. p 45-87
Morrill, Richard. “ Strategic Thinking. ” Political and Civic Leadership. 2010. Sage Publications.
Mouritsen, Jan. “ Balanced Scorecard. ” International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. 2007. Sage Publications.
Pearce, J. and Robinson, R ( 2005 ) Strategic Management, 9th Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
Porter, M. ( 1985 ) Competitive Advantage, New York: Free Press.
Reizenstein, Richard C. “ Market Opportunity Analysis. ” Encyclopedia of Health Care Management. 2003. Sage Publications.
Robinson, S. , Hichens, R. and Wade, D. ( 1978 ) The directional policy matrix-tool for strategic planning, Long Range Planning Journal, Vol. 11, pp.8-15.
Segil, L. ( 2005 ) , ‘Metrics to successfully pull off confederations ‘ , Strategy & A ; Leadership, vol. 33, no. 5, pp.46-52.
Thompson, J. ( 2002 ) Strategic Management, 4th Edition, London: Thomson.
Tsiakkiros A ( 2002 ) “ Strategic planning and instruction: The instance of Cyprus ” , The International Journal of Educational Management Bradford 2002
Waters, Pamela. ( 2008 ) “ Business Improvement Practices. ” Encyclopedia of Substance Abuse Prevention, Treatment, & A ; Recovery. P 101-132